METHODOLOGY

Our commitment to transparency, independence and evidence-based analysis

Comparing workforce management platforms isn't just about listing features — it's about understanding how those features perform when a real business depends on them.

Labour costs, award compliance, rostering efficiency, payroll accuracy and day-to-day staff communication all rely heavily on the software organisations choose. Because of that, we believe the evaluation process must be rigorous, consistent and completely free from undue commercial influence.

This section explains exactly how we assess each platform, the sources we rely on, who conducts the evaluations, how we choose the tools we review, and the standards we apply when forming recommendations. By outlining our full methodology, we aim to give readers confidence that our conclusions are grounded in practical experience rather than marketing.

Why we are experts (who performs the reviews)

Our reviews are conducted by a team with deep operational experience across Australian and New Zealand shift-based industries. Our reviewers include former venue managers, payroll specialists, hospitality operators, HR administrators and compliance consultants who have worked directly with the software categories we evaluate.

We understand the realities of:

rostering and labour management
award interpretation and Fair Work compliance
payroll processing and integrations
managing multi-site operations and cost controls
supporting large, mixed-shift teams across hospitality, retail, care and service sectors

This hands-on experience allows us to evaluate each platform from the perspective of the people who actually use it under operational pressure, rather than as general tech reviewers.

How we choose which software to review

We select platforms based on a structured assessment of relevance, real-world adoption and suitability for our target industries.

We prioritise tools based on:

relevance to ANZ shift-based industries such as hospitality, retail, healthcare, childcare, trades and field services
local compliance capability and award interpretation tools
integration strength with ANZ payroll systems such as Xero and MYOB
maturity, market presence and continued product development
availability of hands-on access for independent testing
sufficient publicly verifiable, non-incentivised user feedback

We exclude systems that are inactive, unsupported, or lack meaningful relevance to Australian and New Zealand businesses.

Hands-on product testing

Our reviews always begin with direct, hands-on evaluation of each platform. We do not rely on vendor demos or sales walk-throughs. Instead, we create and configure our own environments, just as a real business would.

During testing, our team:

creates full accounts and trials
sets up business locations, cost centres and departments
adds staff through manual entry and bulk imports
builds day-to-day, weekly and monthly rosters
tests time clocks across mobile, tablet and web
runs payroll exports to Xero, MYOB and other accounting tools
examines reporting, compliance features and admin workflows
stress-tests responsiveness, stability and error handling

We repeat real operational scenarios such as last-minute shift changes, large-scale timesheet approvals, onboarding new employees and exporting payroll during peak periods.

Insights from trusted, non-incentivised user sources

To complement our internal findings, we analyse verified user feedback from public, non-incentivised sources.

Our primary sources include:

Google Reviews — genuine sentiment from long-term users
Xero App Store — insights from payroll and accounting teams that use integrations daily

We look for:

recurring patterns (positive or negative)
feedback from businesses similar to our target audience
where real experiences align or differ from vendor messaging
support responsiveness and onboarding insights

Excluding pay-to-participate review marketplaces

We intentionally exclude platforms such as G2, Capterra and GetApp due to the commercial incentives that influence rankings and review volume.

incentivised review collection
sponsored placements
limited relevance to ANZ businesses
reviews reflecting onboarding experiences rather than real usage

Evaluating through an australian & new zealand lens

Workforce software must be assessed within the context of local compliance, payroll systems and labour laws.

We focus on industries such as:

hospitality and venues
retail
healthcare and aged care
disability support (NDIS)
childcare
fitness and recreation
trades and field services

We evaluate platforms based on:

accuracy of award interpretation
Fair Work compliance tools
compatibility with ANZ payroll systems
data hosting aligned with Australian Privacy Principles
local support availability

No sponsored influence or paid placement

We maintain strict independence. We do not:

accept payments to review products
offer paid placements
accept incentives to influence rankings
participate in vendor-led marketing exchanges

All our insights are based solely on testing, verified feedback and real operational needs.

Continuous monitoring and updating

Workforce platforms evolve quickly. We continually review updates to ensure our comparisons stay accurate.

pricing changes
feature releases
integration updates
user sentiment shifts
performance improvements or regressions
new regulatory requirements

Our comparison criteria

We apply consistent criteria across every review:

ease of use
rostering and scheduling strength
time and attendance accuracy
award and compliance handling
payroll integration depth
reporting and labour cost control
mobile app experience for staff
support quality and onboarding
scalability and system stability
overall value for ANZ businesses

Why this approach matters

Businesses need reliable, compliant and easy-to-use workforce tools. Our methodology ensures recommendations are grounded in real testing, genuine user feedback and local industry needs.

Found an error? let us know

We review pricing, features and product updates regularly, but details may occasionally shift. If you notice any inaccuracies or have new information to share, please contact us.

FAQ

Questions about our methodology

Common questions about how we review and evaluate workforce management software.

We select platforms based on their relevance to ANZ shift-based industries, local compliance capabilities, integration strength with ANZ payroll systems like Xero and MYOB, market presence and maturity, availability of hands-on access for independent testing, and sufficient publicly verifiable, non-incentivised user feedback. We exclude systems that are inactive, unsupported, or lack meaningful relevance to Australian and New Zealand businesses.
Yes, completely. We maintain strict editorial independence and do not accept payments to review products, offer paid placements, accept incentives to influence rankings, or participate in vendor-led marketing exchanges. All our insights are based solely on hands-on testing, verified user feedback and real operational needs.
We analyse verified user feedback from public, non-incentivised sources including Google Reviews for genuine sentiment from long-term users and the Xero App Store for insights from payroll and accounting teams. We look for recurring patterns, feedback from businesses similar to our target audience, where real experiences align or differ from vendor messaging, and support responsiveness.
We continuously monitor and update our reviews to reflect pricing changes, feature releases, integration updates, user sentiment shifts, performance improvements or regressions, and new regulatory requirements. Workforce platforms evolve quickly, so we ensure our comparisons stay accurate and relevant.

EXPLORE